
2022
Parker-Shames, Phoebe
2022.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: ecological impacts, Marijuana
@phdthesis{Parker-Shames2022,
title = {Ecological Outcomes of Cannabis Legalization: A multidisciplinary study of cannabis land use change, its social drivers, and environmental outcomes},
author = {Phoebe Parker-Shames},
url = {https://angelo.berkeley.edu/parkershamesdissertation/},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-08-10},
urldate = {2022-08-10},
abstract = {Recent state-level legalizations of recreational cannabis across the US have created a large-scale
policy experiment that could alter land use patterns and shape wildlife communities. Cannabis
legalization provides a rare opportunity to study the consequences of land use change in a rural
agriculture frontier. This dissertation explores the ecological outcomes of cannabis legalization
by approaching cannabis landscapes as social-ecological systems and combining multiple
disciplinary approaches. My research takes an interdisciplinary approach to quantifying land use
change and contributes to our context-specific understanding of wildlife responses to human
development. Ultimately, this research provides results that are timely and may be useful for
policy, management, and land use decision-making.
I begin with an introduction on cannabis landscapes as social-ecological systems. I outline a brief
history of cannabis farming in the western US, as well as an explanation of my focus on small-
scale legacy cannabis farming. Then, in Chapter 1, I produce baseline distribution data on
cannabis land use in southern Oregon, and examine the overlap with sensitive ecological
features. This chapter addresses the questions: How is cannabis production distributed? Where
might we be concerned about its environmental impact? In Chapter 2, I use cannabis farmer
interviews to generate model covariates which contextualize the cannabis land use data from the
first chapter. Here, I ask: What drives cannabis land use over time? What is the socio-ecological
context for these drivers? In Chapter 3, I use wildlife camera data to examine the outcomes of
cannabis land use for animals on and surrounding cannabis farms. This chapter focuses on the
question: How do wildlife respond to cannabis farming? In Chapter 4, I detail the methodology
for field experiments that address specific mechanisms of wildlife response to cannabis
cultivation, asking: What is the role of light and noise disturbance in multi-taxa wildlife response
to cannabis? Finally, I conclude with a summary of the broad implications of this work, as well
as future research and policy recommendations.},
keywords = {ecological impacts, Marijuana},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {phdthesis}
}
policy experiment that could alter land use patterns and shape wildlife communities. Cannabis
legalization provides a rare opportunity to study the consequences of land use change in a rural
agriculture frontier. This dissertation explores the ecological outcomes of cannabis legalization
by approaching cannabis landscapes as social-ecological systems and combining multiple
disciplinary approaches. My research takes an interdisciplinary approach to quantifying land use
change and contributes to our context-specific understanding of wildlife responses to human
development. Ultimately, this research provides results that are timely and may be useful for
policy, management, and land use decision-making.
I begin with an introduction on cannabis landscapes as social-ecological systems. I outline a brief
history of cannabis farming in the western US, as well as an explanation of my focus on small-
scale legacy cannabis farming. Then, in Chapter 1, I produce baseline distribution data on
cannabis land use in southern Oregon, and examine the overlap with sensitive ecological
features. This chapter addresses the questions: How is cannabis production distributed? Where
might we be concerned about its environmental impact? In Chapter 2, I use cannabis farmer
interviews to generate model covariates which contextualize the cannabis land use data from the
first chapter. Here, I ask: What drives cannabis land use over time? What is the socio-ecological
context for these drivers? In Chapter 3, I use wildlife camera data to examine the outcomes of
cannabis land use for animals on and surrounding cannabis farms. This chapter focuses on the
question: How do wildlife respond to cannabis farming? In Chapter 4, I detail the methodology
for field experiments that address specific mechanisms of wildlife response to cannabis
cultivation, asking: What is the role of light and noise disturbance in multi-taxa wildlife response
to cannabis? Finally, I conclude with a summary of the broad implications of this work, as well
as future research and policy recommendations.
2021
Dillis, C; Polson, M; Bodwitch, H; Carah, J; Power, ME; Sayre, N
Industrializing Cannabis? Socio-Ecological Implications of Legalization and Regulation in California Book Chapter
In: pp. 10, Routledge, New York, NY, 2021.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: Marijuana
@inbook{Dillis2021,
title = {Industrializing Cannabis? Socio-Ecological Implications of Legalization and Regulation in California},
author = {C Dillis and M Polson and H Bodwitch and J Carah and ME Power and N Sayre},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429320491},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-09-06},
urldate = {2021-09-06},
pages = {10},
publisher = {Routledge},
address = {New York, NY},
keywords = {Marijuana},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
2015
Carah, Jennifer K.; Howard, Jeanette K.; Thompson, Sally E.; Gianotti, Anne G. Short; Bauer, Scott D.; Carlson, Stephanie M.; Dralle, David N.; Gabriel, Mourad W.; Hulette, Lisa L.; Johnson, Brian J.; Knight, Curtis A.; Kupferberg, Sarah J.; Martin, Stefanie L.; Naylor, Rosamond L.; Power, Mary E.
High Time for Conservation: Adding the Environment to the Debate on Marijuana Liberalization Journal Article
In: BioScience, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 822-829, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Environment, ERCZO, Marijuana
@article{Carah2015,
title = {High Time for Conservation: Adding the Environment to the Debate on Marijuana Liberalization},
author = {Jennifer K. Carah and Jeanette K. Howard and Sally E. Thompson and Anne G. Short Gianotti and Scott D. Bauer and Stephanie M. Carlson and David N. Dralle and Mourad W. Gabriel and Lisa L. Hulette and Brian J. Johnson and Curtis A. Knight and Sarah J. Kupferberg and Stefanie L. Martin and Rosamond L. Naylor and Mary E. Power},
url = {https://angelo.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/59/Carah_2015-Biosci.pdf},
doi = {10.1093/biosci/biv083},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-08-01},
urldate = {2015-08-01},
journal = {BioScience},
volume = {65},
number = {8},
pages = {822-829},
abstract = {The liberalization of marijuana policies, including the legalization of medical and recreational marijuana, is sweeping the United States and other countries. Marijuana cultivation can have significant negative collateral effects on the environment that are often unknown or overlooked. Focusing on the state of California, where by some estimates 60%–70% of the marijuana consumed in the United States is grown, we argue that (a) the environmental harm caused by marijuana cultivation merits a direct policy response, (b) current approaches to governing the environmental effects are inadequate, and (c) neglecting discussion of the environmental impacts of cultivation when shaping future marijuana use and possession policies represents a missed opportunity to reduce, regulate, and mitigate environmental harm.},
keywords = {Environment, ERCZO, Marijuana},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}